EN
Text size

High contrast
Stronger text and background colours

Home  /  Research  /  Scientific Publications

Half a century of M35.4 in 36 publications.

A curated review of the scientific literature on eosinophilic fasciitis — from Shulman's first description to the latest clinical reports.

36 Entries
1975 — 2025 Time span
0 Randomised trials
Filter
/ 01

Cornerstone publications

1975 Original description

Diffuse fasciitis with eosinophilia: a new syndrome?

Shulman LE

Trans Assoc Am Physicians · 88:70-86

Key takeaway

First description of a new syndrome — diffuse fasciitis with eosinophilia, distinguished from scleroderma by the sparing of the fingers, the absence of Raynaud's phenomenon and the dramatic response to corticosteroids.

1988 Cohort

Eosinophilic fasciitis: clinical spectrum and therapeutic response in 52 cases

Lakhanpal S, Ginsburg WW, Michet CJ, Doyle JA, Moore SB

Semin Arthritis Rheum · 17(4):221-231

Key takeaway

First large single-centre cohort (Mayo Clinic): 52 patients, the modern phenotype of EF — frequent flexion contractures (n = 29), associated morphea (n = 15), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 12) and a handful of haematological associations.

2005 Imaging

Eosinophilic fasciitis: spectrum of MRI findings

Moulton SJ, Kransdorf MJ, Ginsburg WW, Abril A, Persellin S

AJR Am J Roentgenol · 184(3):975-978

Key takeaway

Reference MRI series: fascial T2 hyperintensity and post-gadolinium enhancement are characteristic findings and correlate with disease activity, supporting MRI as a non-invasive tool for both diagnosis and monitoring.

2012 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease)

Lebeaux D, Sène D

Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol · 26(4):449-458

Key takeaway

The benchmark clinical review of the past 15 years — a synthesis of clinical presentation, the diagnostic workup and therapeutic options for what was still called Shulman disease at that time.

2014 Diagnostic criteria

Diagnosis and classification of eosinophilic fasciitis

Pinal-Fernandez I, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Grau JM

Autoimmun Rev · 13(4-5):379-382

Key takeaway

First formal set of diagnostic criteria for EF: one major criterion (skin/subcutaneous induration sparing the digits) plus minor criteria covering eosinophilia, hypergammaglobulinaemia, MRI and histology. Still the most cited framework.

2020 Cohort

Baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes of eosinophilic fasciitis in 89 patients seen at a single center over 20 years

Mango RL, Bugdayli K, Crowson CS, et al.

Int J Rheum Dis · 23(2):233-239

Key takeaway

Largest long-term cohort to date: 89 Mayo Clinic patients followed over 20 years. Most cases are self-limited once treated; combined corticosteroids and methotrexate produce the best outcomes, with disability concentrated in patients with a delayed start of therapy.

/ 02

The wider literature

2025 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis: new developments and future directions

Huynh M, Bogdanski E, Fleshman T, Schneider J, Libson K, et al.

Int J Dermatol · 64(8):1356-1370

Key takeaway

The most recent broad review in this corpus — what has moved in the last few years, and where the open questions now sit.

2025 Cohort

Clinicopathological profile of eosinophilic fasciitis: a retrospective cohort study from a neuromuscular disorder center in China

Wang X, Zhang L, Hou Y, Dai T, Ma X, et al.

Arthritis Res Ther · 27(1):110

Key takeaway

Seventeen patients from a Chinese neuromuscular centre. Skin thickening in all of them and a male predominance (70.6 %) — but eosinophilia in only 41.2 %, a reminder that a normal eosinophil count does not rule the diagnosis out.

2025 Case series

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related eosinophilic fasciitis: 3 case reports with literature review

Biteau M, Sibaud V, Maria A, Dion J, Uro-Coste E, et al.

Rev Med Interne · 46(7):377-385

Key takeaway

Thirty cases of fasciitis appearing after immune-checkpoint-inhibitor therapy, median onset ten months into treatment and half of them in melanoma patients — a drug-triggered form that did not exist before modern oncology.

2025 Review

Characteristics and factors associated with treatment response among patients with eosinophilic fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hamdan O, Alshajrawi R, Mussa Q, Alajlouni Y, Dabbah Y, et al.

Rheumatol Int · 45(4):71

Key takeaway

The largest pooled dataset available: 597 patients drawn from 476 published case reports. Mean age 44.5, sex ratio 1:1, eosinophilia in 90.2 %, response to treatment in 82.2 % — and relapse in 24.5 % of those who first responded. Most figures on our statistics page come from here.

2025 Case series

Case series: extracutaneous findings of eosinophilic fasciitis patients

Yuce Inel T, Karabacak M, Onen F, Birlik M

Int J Rheum Dis · 28(2):e70142

Key takeaway

A series concentrating on what happens beyond the skin: every patient had distal upper-limb thickening sparing the hands and feet, 87.5 % had raised acute-phase reactants, and only three-quarters had peripheral eosinophilia.

2024 Imaging

Imaging of eosinophilic fasciitis in ultrasound and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging): a case report

Gerritzen N, Ziob J, Brossart P, Schäfer VS

Z Rheumatol · 83(2):134-138

Key takeaway

A German-language case report documenting the same patient side by side in ultrasound and MRI — useful because it shows what each modality does and does not reveal.

2024 Cohort

Functional and cutaneous treatment outcomes with intravenous immunoglobulin for eosinophilic fasciitis: a retrospective study

Obiakor B, Fan W, Jacobson R, Gandelman J, Haemel A

J Drugs Dermatol · 23(4):e107-e109

Key takeaway

Eighteen patients reviewed at a tertiary centre; of the seven given intravenous immunoglobulin, five of the six with follow-up sustained both cutaneous and functional improvement. One of the few datasets on IVIG in refractory disease.

2024 Cohort

Juvenile eosinophilic fasciitis: a single center case series

Stubbs LA, Ogunbona O, Beil E, Szafron V, Adesina A, et al.

Pediatr Rheumatol Online J · 22(1):29

Key takeaway

Six children diagnosed between the ages of 4 and 16 — a reminder that the adult diagnostic criteria are routinely applied to paediatric patients without having been validated in them.

2024 Case series

Eosinophilic fasciitis following COVID-19: a case series of 3 patients

Li Y, Kong HE, Cheeley J

JAAD Case Rep · 44:6-10

Key takeaway

Three patients developing EF after a SARS-CoV-2 infection — an early published series supporting a viral trigger for the disease in part of the population.

2023 Imaging

Diagnostic imaging for eosinophilic fasciitis: a systematic review

Chohan S, Wong N, Hanson J, Darwish M, Osto M, et al.

JAAD Int · 13:10-12

Key takeaway

A systematic review of the imaging literature, pulling together which modalities have actually been used to support the diagnosis and what each one contributes.

2023 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis may present as a paraneoplastic syndrome of hematological malignancies: a systematic review

Chohan S, Wong N, Hanson J, Osto M, Daveluy S

JAAD Int · 11:85-87

Key takeaway

A systematic review of the cases in which fasciitis preceded or accompanied a haematological malignancy — the argument for not assuming a new diagnosis is idiopathic.

2022 Diagnostic criteria

The groove sign in eosinophilic fasciitis

Camard M, Maisonobe T, Flamarion E

Clin Rheumatol · 41(12):3919-3920

Key takeaway

A short clinical-image report given over entirely to the groove sign — valuable precisely because it shows the sign rather than describing it in words.

2022 Cohort

Graft versus host disease-related eosinophilic fasciitis: cohort description and literature review

Hidalgo Calleja C, Martín Hidalgo D, Román Curto C, Vázquez López L, Pérez López E, et al.

Adv Rheumatol · 62(1):33

Key takeaway

Fasciitis arising as a manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease, drawn from 118 patients followed in a multidisciplinary transplant clinic, with a review of the fascial manifestations of cGVHD alongside.

2022 Imaging

MRI findings of eosinophilic fasciitis

Kubincová M, Vanhoenacker FM

J Belg Soc Radiol · 106(1):48

Key takeaway

A concise radiological account of the MRI appearance of the disease, written for the reporting radiologist rather than the treating clinician.

2022 Review

Biologic treatment outcomes in refractory eosinophilic fasciitis: a systematic review of published reports

Mufti A, Kashetsky N, Abduelmula A, Lytvyn Y, Sachdeva M, et al.

J Am Acad Dermatol · 86(4):951-953

Key takeaway

A systematic review of every published case treated with a biologic — assembled because refractory disease has no trial evidence to fall back on.

2022 Review

Clinical guide to eosinophilic fasciitis: straddling dermatology and rheumatology

Naschitz JE

Expert Rev Clin Immunol · 18(7):649-651

Key takeaway

A short editorial arguing that the disease sits in the gap between two specialties, and is missed when neither takes ownership of it.

2019 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis: from pathophysiology to treatment

Ihn H

Allergol Int · 68(4):437-439

Key takeaway

A compact review running from what is known of the pathophysiology through to the treatment sequence, from one of the authors of the Japanese guideline.

2018 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis: current concepts

Fett N, Arthur M

Clin Dermatol · 36(4):487-497

Key takeaway

A dermatology-side review of current concepts — the counterpart to the rheumatology reviews, and relevant because the first doctor to see the skin is often a dermatologist.

2018 Diagnostic criteria

Diagnostic criteria, severity classification and guidelines of eosinophilic fasciitis

Jinnin M, Yamamoto T, Asano Y, Ishikawa O, Sato S, et al.

J Dermatol · 45(8):881-890

Key takeaway

A Japanese consensus document pairing diagnostic criteria with a severity classification and management guidance — a criteria framework developed separately from Pinal-Fernandez 2014.

2018 Cohort

Clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic features of eosinophilic fasciitis and morphea profunda: a comparative study of 27 cases

Onajin O, Wieland CN, Peters MS, Lohse CM, Lehman JS

J Am Acad Dermatol · 78(1):121-128

Key takeaway

Twenty-seven cases compared histologically and immunophenotypically against morphea profunda — the study that addresses how far the two can actually be told apart down the microscope.

2017 Review

Eosinophilic fasciitis: an updated review on diagnosis and treatment

Mazori DR, Femia AN, Vleugels RA

Curr Rheumatol Rep · 19(12):74

Key takeaway

Updated practical review — diagnostic pitfalls, a treatment algorithm and a re-evaluation of biologics (rituximab, tocilizumab) for refractory disease.

2016 Cohort

High-dose intravenous pulse methotrexate in patients with eosinophilic fasciitis

Mertens JS, Zweers MC, Kievit W, Knaapen HK, Gerritsen M, et al.

JAMA Dermatol · 152(11):1262-1265

Key takeaway

Twelve patients given monthly high-dose intravenous methotrexate for five months; the modified skin score fell from 17.5 to 8.5. Registered as a trial (NCT00441961), but single-arm — there is no control group.

2016 Cohort

Severe eosinophilic fasciitis: comparison of treatment with D-penicillamine plus corticosteroids vs. corticosteroids alone

Mendoza FA, Bai R, Kebede AG, Jimenez SA

Scand J Rheumatol · 45(2):129-134

Key takeaway

Sixteen patients with severe disease: ten on d-penicillamine plus corticosteroids, six on corticosteroids alone. The combination did better on both affected body-surface area and overall improvement — but the study states plainly that it was not randomised.

2016 Cohort

Epidemiology and treatment of eosinophilic fasciitis: an analysis of 63 patients from 3 tertiary care centers

Wright NA, Mazori DR, Patel M, Merola JF, Femia AN, Vleugels RA

JAMA Dermatol · 152(1):97-99

Key takeaway

Three-centre cohort, n = 63: complete remission reached 64 % under prednisone + methotrexate versus 30 % under prednisone alone, establishing combination therapy as the de-facto first line.

2015 Imaging

Eosinophilic fasciitis: typical abnormalities, variants and differential diagnosis of fasciae abnormalities using MR imaging

Kirchgesner T, Dallaudière B, Omoumi P, Malghem J, Vande Berg B, et al.

Diagn Interv Imaging · 96(4):341-348

Key takeaway

A radiological reference on MR imaging of the fasciae: the typical appearances in eosinophilic fasciitis, its variants, and how to tell other fascial abnormalities apart from it.

2007 Diagnostic criteria

Eosinophilic fasciitis: report of two cases and a systematic review of the literature dealing with clinical variables that predict outcome

Endo Y, Tamura A, Matsushima Y, Iwasaki T, Hasegawa M, et al.

Clin Rheumatol · 26(9):1445-1451

Key takeaway

Two cases plus a systematic review of the literature, focused specifically on which clinical variables predict how a patient will do.

2001 Case series

Eosinophilic fasciitis and simvastatin

Choquet-Kastylevsky G, Kanitakis J, Dumas V, Descotes J, Faure M, et al.

Arch Intern Med · 161(11):1456-1457

Key takeaway

A short report of fasciitis associated with simvastatin — an early entry in the drug-associated literature, decades before the checkpoint-inhibitor cases.

1991 Review

The eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome and eosinophilic fasciitis

Jimenez SA, Varga J

Curr Opin Rheumatol · 3(6):986-994

Key takeaway

A contemporary review setting eosinophilic fasciitis alongside the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome, written at the point when the two were being told apart.

1990 Original description

Tryptophan-induced eosinophilic fasciitis

Cotsarelis G, Werth V

J Am Acad Dermatol · 23(5 Pt 1):938-941

Key takeaway

Fasciitis induced by L-tryptophan, from the period when tryptophan supplements were under investigation as a trigger of fasciitis-like illness.

1980 Original description

Eosinophilic fasciitis

Moore TL, Zuckner J

Semin Arthritis Rheum · 9(3):228-235

Key takeaway

One of the earliest reviews of the syndrome, published five years after Shulman's report, while its boundary against scleroderma was still being drawn.